McClain 's Take
McClain does acknowledge the potency of ordinary people taking to the streets and dancing in celebration, dressing up in costumes, cross-dressing, making love in alleyways and otherwise engaging in carnivalesque, anti-establishment, counter normative behavior. As he writes, "the frenzied dances and rowdy, lewd behavior of the merrymakers symbolized despair about a fast-changing, unpredictable economy and a polity that had fallen into dissaray....Their songs and ditties lampooned the shogunate, ridiculed its policies, denied its legitimacy, and helped pave the way for its downfall. (151-152).
And from pp. 153-54:
Saigo, Ito, Kido, and the other men who brought down the Tokugawa polity usually are not regarded as heroes of one of the world's great revolutions. they did not proclaim any stirring new values that would inspire all humankind like liberte, egalite, and fraternite had in France the previous century, nor did they set out to advance the interests of an economicaslly and socially marginalized class, as happened in Russua and China the next century....The men who attacked the shogunate cloaked their actions in tradition by calling for a restoration of rule by the Heavenly Sovereign, snd their victory came relatively quickly, with comparatively little terror or sustained violence.
But the young men of 1868 intended to do far more than stage a coup d'etat that would resurrect the inherited values of the past and save their home domains from extinction. In the early decades of the century Japan's "troubles from within" had raised serious questions about the ability of the traditional polity to respond to problems of samurai impoverishment and morale, adapt to the economic transformations set in motion by protoindustrialization and the commercialization of agriculture, cope with social chaos, answer criticism from intellectuals, and make new room for the new political consciousness evident in acts of collective dissidence. The "troubles from without" which began in earnest with Perry's arrival, revealed the structural weaknesses and ideological bankruptcy of the shogunate, and the regime's capitulation to foreign demands earned it the animosity of "men of high purpose" and the loathing of peasants and urban dwellers who railed against Japan's semi-colonial status.
Ito, Saigo, Iwakura, and the others possessed no specific blueprint for future change when they took over the helm of state in 1868, but they did have a general sense of the new directions they wished to travel...[They] pinpointed the need to create more flexible governing institutions that would enlist the abilities of men of talent, promote national unity under the aegis of the Heavenly Sovereign, and improve living conditions for everyone....[There was] a dawning recognition that industrialization and foreign trade could enhance national strength and create domestic prosperity....[They were convinced] that only innovative, radical changes could correct the disarray and save the future.
|