Aristotle on Causality,
The Four Causes
http://www.uri.edu/personal/szunjic/philos/causes.jpg
To be able to give a rational account of constant
change in the realm of natural beings and consequently to lay ground for
physics as an explanatory potent science Aristotle introduces a scheme of
causal relations.
Nature itself is a principle and a cause of change.
But we speak about the cause with regard to four different points of reference
each pointing to one aspect of the more general question "why something
is".
To
ask "why something is" means to identify main factors in the process
of potentiality realization. Aristotle explicates this question in a fourfold
way:
1.
Out of what has a thing come? |
Answer
obtained by identifying: The Material Cause: |
|
The material cause points to "that from which,
as a constituent, an object comes into being." (For instance, the bronze
of a statue.) |
2.
What is it? |
Answer
obtained by identifying: The Formal Cause: |
|
The formal cause embodies the essential nature (all
essential attributes) and represents the model or archetype of the outcome;
conceptually it is expressed in the definition (logos). (It is the idea of the
statue as present in artist's head.) |
3.
By means of what is it? |
Answer
obtained by identifying: The Efficient Cause: |
|
The
efficient cause is "the source of the change or rest"; it is the
moving cause: "what makes of what is made and what changes of what is
changed" (the sculptor who makes the statue). |
4.
For the sake of what is it? |
Answer
obtained by identifying: The Final Cause: |
|
The
final cause states "that for the sake of which" a thing is done,
or, in other words, it explicates something's end (the final shape or the
effect on the audience which admires the statue). |
Note: Although Aristotle himself
holds all these four causes responsible for any real change and movement (aitia in Greek are those things that
are "guilty" or responsible for something), they are rather
demarcation points of change as revealed in our language than true causes (with
a possible exception of the efficient cause, which is nowadays considered to be
the only real cause out of the four). In difference to the modern concept of
causation, which always implies a sequence of two events, Aristotle envisions
causation as a single event of double actualization: agent's potential to
effectuate something and patient's potential to sustain that change.
http://www.uri.edu/personal/szunjic/philos/physics.htm