Dept. of Homeland Sec. v. New York
1. Whether entities that are not subject to the public-charge ground of inadmissibility contained in 8 U.S.C. 1182(a)(4)(A), and which seek to expand benefits usage by aliens who are potentially subject to that provision, are proper parties to challenge the final rule. 2. Whether the final rule is likely contrary to law or arbitrary and capricious.
Area(s) of Law:- Administrative Law
Wooden, William D. v. United States
Did the Sixth Circuit err by expanding the score of 18 U.S.C. § 924(e)(1) in the absence of clear statutory definition with regard to the vague term "committed on occasions differed from one another"?
Area(s) of Law:- Constitutional Law
PennEast Pipeline Co., LLC v. New Jersey
Whether the NGA delegates to FERC certificate holders the authority to exercise the federal government’s eminent domain power to condemn land in which a state claims an interest.
Area(s) of Law:- Administrative Law