Aaron Reichenberger

Oregon Court of Appeals (3 summaries)

State v. Kinney

Despite a defendant’s proffered stipulation, evidence may be admissible if it is relevant to prove a fact that is at issue notwithstanding the stipulation. Furthermore, evidence against a defendant is not unfairly prejudicial solely because it is graphic in nature.

Area(s) of Law:
  • Evidence

State v. Dries

Under ORCP 59 H, a party must “state with particularity” the trial court’s alleged error in order to preserve an appellate challenge to the error.

Area(s) of Law:
  • Civil Procedure

Johnson v. Deschutes County

The proper analysis for determining a common law vested right to develop property under section 5(3) of Measure 49 was handed down in Friends of Yamhill County v. Board of Commissioners . However, in reviewing a hearings officer determination, the writ of review court cannot render its own factual findings.

Area(s) of Law:
  • Land Use

Back to Top